IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i5p1461-1468..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enough for all: no mating effort adjustment to varying mate availability in a gift-giving spider

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Magris
  • Cristina Tuni
  • Per Smiseth

Abstract

Males of a gift-giving spider do not modify their allocation to reproduction when mating opportunities vary. Due to their costly courtship via provision of food gifts to females, with high female availability males should reduce their reproductive investment per partner to avoid exhausting their energetic budget too early. Our findings suggest instead that males may be able to enlarge their total reproductive budget, possibly drawing resources from their food gifts by partially feeding on them. Reproduction is costly, and because males possess a finite energetic budget, resource allocation to one mating event may constrain investment in subsequent matings. Consequently, males of many species evolved to adjust their reproductive investment in response to mating opportunities. When female availability is high, males are predicted to partition their reproductive effort among multiple partners to avoid resource depletion before mating opportunities have ceased. We tested this prediction in males of the spider Pisaura mirabilis, which mate via costly nuptial gifts consisting of silk-wrapped prey and are known to respond to social cues (rivals’ presence) by adjusting their reproductive investment. We manipulated the number of females exposed to males to induce perception of high mating opportunities versus low mating opportunities, and scored male investment to premating traits (time allocated to gift construction and courtship) and traits at mating (copulation duration) during interactions with a female. We expected males facing higher mating opportunities to reduce their investment in all measured traits, but instead found no differences in male trait expression. These findings indicate lack of resource partitioning in response to variation in female availability, as males may be able to draw resources from nonreproductive traits (growth or immune defense) or may increase their food intake at mating by partially consuming the nuptial gift. Hence, despite their associated costs, by providing a source of nutrition, nuptial prey gifts may weaken selection for adaptive plasticity in male reproductive investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Magris & Cristina Tuni & Per Smiseth, 2019. "Enough for all: no mating effort adjustment to varying mate availability in a gift-giving spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(5), pages 1461-1468.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:5:p:1461-1468.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz102
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:5:p:1461-1468.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.