IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i5p1398-1405..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of microhabitat specialization on mating communication in a wolf spider

Author

Listed:
  • Malcolm F Rosenthal
  • Eileen A Hebets
  • Benji Kessler
  • Rowan McGinley
  • Damian O Elias
  • Rebecca C Fuller

Abstract

Animal signals experience selection for detectability, which is determined in large part by the signal transmission properties of the habitat. Understanding the ecological context in which communication takes place is therefore critical to understanding selection on the form of communication signals. In order to determine the influence of environmental heterogeneity on signal transmission, we focus on a wolf spider species native to central Florida, Schizocosa floridana, in which males court females using a substrate-borne vibratory song. We test the hypothesis that S. floridana is a substrate specialist by 1) assessing substrate use by females and males in the field, 2) quantifying substrate-specific vibratory signal transmission in the laboratory, and 3) determining substrate-specific mating success in the laboratory. We predict a priori that 1) S. floridana restricts its signaling to oak litter, 2) oak litter best transmits their vibratory signal, and 3) S. floridana mates most readily on oak litter. We find that S. floridana is almost exclusively found on oak litter, which was found to attenuate vibratory courtship signals the least. Spiders mated with equal frequency on oak and pine, but did not mate at all on sand. Additionally, we describe how S. floridana song contains a novel component, chirps, which attenuate more strongly than its other display components on pine and sand, but not on oak, suggesting that the ways in which the environment relaxes restrictions on signal form may be as important as the ways in which it imposes them. We examined the relationship between habitat use and song structure in the wolf spider Schizocosa floridana. We found the spiders restricted their habitat use to oak litter, which transmitted their songs best, even though their environment contained many substrate types. We also found that the pure tone “chirp” unique to this spider’s song was more strongly degraded by nonoak substrates than other song components, suggesting that substrate specialization may have been key to its evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Malcolm F Rosenthal & Eileen A Hebets & Benji Kessler & Rowan McGinley & Damian O Elias & Rebecca C Fuller, 2019. "The effects of microhabitat specialization on mating communication in a wolf spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(5), pages 1398-1405.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:5:p:1398-1405.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz091
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:5:p:1398-1405.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.