IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i4p993-1000..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maintenance of deceptive gifts in a natural spider population: ecological and demographic factors

Author

Listed:
  • Maria J Albo
  • Valentina Franco-Trecu
  • Filip J Wojciechowski
  • Søren Toft
  • Trine Bilde

Abstract

Males of the spider Pisaura mirabilis offer a nuptial gift to females, usually an insect prey wrapped in silk. Sometimes males deceive females by offering a worthless gift that contains prey leftovers. The existence of 2 distinct life-history strategies (early small and late large body size) and survival differences through the mating season may explain the variation in tactic use by males. Alternative mating tactics are expected to occur predominantly when mate competition is intense, resources are in short supply, or as a result of asymmetric power relationships between individuals. Males of the nuptial gift-giving spider Pisaura mirabilis use a prevailing tactic of offering a nutritive gift (insect prey) and a deceptive tactic of offering a worthless gift (consumed prey) to prospective mates. If the male’s tactic depends on precopulatory male–male competition, worthless gifts should occur primarily late in the season, when the operational sex ratio (OSR) becomes male-biased. If it depends on resource availability and/or postcopulatory sexual selection (sperm competition), worthless gifts should occur mostly early in the mating season, when prey availability is low and most females are unmated (i.e., postcopulatory sexual selection is weak). Nuptial gift construction correlated positively with prey availability and negatively with OSR, suggesting that males increase reproductive effort when resource and mate availability increase. We did not find evidence for body condition affecting male tactic use. Male size had a marked effect on the reproductive tactic employed. Males that matured early in the season were very small and employed mostly the nutritive gift tactic during their short life. Among the males that matured later and persisted through the season, relatively small males employed the worthless gift tactic whereas large males employed the nutritive gift tactic. We suggest that the existence of 2 distinct life-history strategies among males (early small and late large size) interacts with environmental and demographic conditions to maintain the deceptive tactic.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria J Albo & Valentina Franco-Trecu & Filip J Wojciechowski & Søren Toft & Trine Bilde, 2019. "Maintenance of deceptive gifts in a natural spider population: ecological and demographic factors," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 993-1000.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:993-1000.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz040
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:993-1000.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.