IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i4p1113-1122..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facing death together: heterospecific aggregations of blowfly larvae evince mutual benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Larissa Komo
  • Quentin Scanvion
  • Valéry Hedouin
  • Damien Charabidze

Abstract

Heterospecific aggregations and foraging associations have been observed between different species, from apes to birds to insects. Such associations are hypothesized to result in a mutually beneficial relationship entailing benefits that are not apparent in conspecific groupings. Therefore, the objectives of the present study were to investigate 1) how 3 blowfly species, namely, Calliphora vicina, Calliphora vomitoria, and Lucilia sericata, aggregate according to species, and 2) if developmental benefits are linked to heterospecific aggregation. For objective (1), larvae of 2 species were placed between 2 conspecific aggregates, each with a different species (i.e., a binary choice test). After 20 h, the positions of all larvae were determined. On average, 98% of the maggots added later settled together on one of the 2 pre-existing aggregations, demonstrating a collective choice. The aggregation spot with C. vicina was preferred against others, indicating different attractiveness of different species. To relate this behavior to its benefits (objective ii), C. vicina and L. sericata larvae were raised from first instar to adult in con- and heterospecific conditions, and their development time, mortality rates, and morphometrics were measured. Thereby, mutual and asymmetric consequences were observed: specifically, there were significant increases in size and survival for L. sericata and faster development for C. vicina in heterospecific groups. These results indicate that the predilection for heterospecific association leads to mutual developmental benefits. This heterospecific aggregation behavior may be a resource-management strategy of blowflies to face carrion-based selection pressure. This study highlights how heterospecific associations of blowflies improve their development, a likely strategy to face harsh environmental conditions. The coexistence of competing species has been observed between different animals, from apes to birds to insects. Using blowfly larvae, we have shown the existence and benefits of heterospecific aggregations within Diptera. These benefits in development time, survival, and size were apparent within heterospecifics but not in conspecific groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Larissa Komo & Quentin Scanvion & Valéry Hedouin & Damien Charabidze, 2019. "Facing death together: heterospecific aggregations of blowfly larvae evince mutual benefits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 1113-1122.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:1113-1122.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:1113-1122.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.