IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i4p1062-1068..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sharing the burden: on the division of parental care and vocalizations during incubation

Author

Listed:
  • Marwa M Kavelaars
  • Luc Lens
  • Wendt Müller

Abstract

In biparental species, both pair-members contribute to parental care to enhance offspring growth and survival. The cost of care should be equally distributed between them. Parents are therefore expected to adjust their parental investment to their partner’s contribution. We found that lesser black-backed gull pairs that vocalized more divided their incubation stints more equally. Furthermore, pairs that shared incubation more equally raised offspring of higher quality when experiencing more challenging conditions. In species with biparental care, individuals only have to pay the costs for their own parental investment, whereas the contribution of their partner comes for free. Each parent hence benefits if its partner works harder, creating an evolutionary conflict of interest. How parents resolve this conflict and how they achieve the optimal division of parental tasks often remains elusive. In this study, we investigated whether lesser black-backed gulls (Larus fuscus) divide parental care during incubation equally and whether this correlates with the extent of vocalizations between pair-members during incubation. We then investigated whether pairs showing more evenly distributed incubation behavior had a higher reproductive success. To this end, we recorded incubation behavior and vocalizations for 24-h time periods. Subsequently, we experimentally increased or decreased brood sizes in order to manipulate parental effort, and followed offspring development from hatching till fledging. Although incubation bouts were, on average, slightly longer in females, patterns varied strongly between pairs, ranging from primarily female incubation over equal sex contributions to male-biased incubation. Pairs contributing more equally to incubation vocalized more during nest relief and had a higher reproductive output when brood sizes were experimentally increased. Thus, vocalizations and a more equal division of parental care during incubation may facilitate higher levels of care during the nestling period, as suggested by a greater reproductive success when facing high brood demand, or they indicate pair quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Marwa M Kavelaars & Luc Lens & Wendt Müller, 2019. "Sharing the burden: on the division of parental care and vocalizations during incubation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 1062-1068.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:1062-1068.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:1062-1068.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.