IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i4p1050-1061..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Battle of the sexes: a multi-male mating strategy helps lionesses win the gender war of fitness

Author

Listed:
  • Stotra Chakrabarti
  • Yadvendradev V Jhala

Abstract

Lion king, a phrase promoting male supremacy, is now being put to test. Contention between genders is common in many species, escalating to a point in lions where males kill unrelated young at a cost to mothers’ fitness. Asiatic lionesses have adopted a strategy to protect cubs from infanticide by mating with many males and confusing them regarding cub parentage. In a hitherto unknown system for lions where multiple males concurrently abound, lionesses outwit them and win the crown of fitness. In species exhibiting infanticide by males, females lose out with high stakes and should adopt preemptive mechanisms, pitching the genders in an evolutionary arms race for maximizing fitness. African lions remain a quintessential model of this gender war, with a coalition of males gaining temporary but exclusive breeding rights over a female group after killing all cubs of former males. However in Asiatic lions, now found as a single population in Gir forests, India, adults live in same-sex groups that interact primarily for mating. Intensive monitoring of 70 adult lions revealed that female groups (n = 9) used exclusive territories, whereas male ranges (n = 11 coalitions) overlapped at areas of intense female use. A social network of mating events (n = 76) indicated that lionesses mated with multiple rival coalitions before conceiving. These neighboring coalitions, although hostile to each other were tolerant toward the same litters, suggestive of confused paternity among them. Given a land-tenure system where lionesses encounter many males capable of killing unfamiliar cubs, multi-male mating buffers cub infanticide and likely diversifies paternal lineages in litters. Consequently, infanticide was observed only when “new” males invaded a female group’s territory. An age-based mate choice was observed in lionesses: maiden breeders chose males having highest range overlaps, whereas experienced females selected peripheral males. The intergender spacing patterns and resultant sexual strategies of lions differ in Asia and Africa probably because of contrasting resource availability, highlighting behavioral plasticity within species inhabiting diverse eco-regions. By mating with multiple males, lionesses safeguard their investments and outdo the males in the war of fitness.

Suggested Citation

  • Stotra Chakrabarti & Yadvendradev V Jhala, 2019. "Battle of the sexes: a multi-male mating strategy helps lionesses win the gender war of fitness," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 1050-1061.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:1050-1061.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:1050-1061.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.