IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i4p1012-1019..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social experiences shape behavioral individuality and within-individual stability

Author

Listed:
  • Heidi Y Jäger
  • Chang S Han
  • Niels J Dingemanse

Abstract

We test the social niche specialization hypothesis by examining behavioral individuality and within-individual stability in aggression and dietary preference. We used male field crickets raised alone or with conspecifics. We show that repeated social interactions lead to long-term individual differences in aggression. Living with a competitor decreased protein consumption but did not affect individual differentiation in dietary intake. Individual repeatability characterizes many behaviors. Repeatable behavior may result from repeated social interactions among familiar group members, owing to adaptive social niche specialization. In the context of aggression, in species like field crickets, social niche specialization should also occur when individuals repeatedly interact with unfamiliar individuals. This would require the outcome of social interactions to have carry-over effects on fighting ability and aggressiveness in subsequent interactions, leading to long-term among-individual differentiation. To test this hypothesis, we randomly assigned freshly emerged adult males of the southern field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus to either a solitary or social treatment. In social treatment, males interacted with a same-sex partner but experienced a new partner every 3 days. After 3 weeks of treatment, we repeatedly subjected treated males to dyadic interactions to measure aggression. During this time, we also continuously measured the 3-daily rate of carbohydrate and protein consumption. Individual differentiation was considerably higher among males reared in the social versus solitary environment for aggressiveness but not for nutrient intake. Simultaneously, social experience led to lower within-individual stability (i.e., increased within-individual variance) in carbohydrate intake. Past social experiences, thus, shaped both behavioral individuality and stability. While previous research has emphasized behavioral individuality resulting from repeated interactions among familiar individuals, our study implies that behavioral individuality, in the context of aggression, may generally result from social interactions, whether with familiar or unfamiliar individuals. Our findings thus imply that social interactions may have a stronger effect on individual differentiation than previously appreciated.

Suggested Citation

  • Heidi Y Jäger & Chang S Han & Niels J Dingemanse, 2019. "Social experiences shape behavioral individuality and within-individual stability," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 1012-1019.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:1012-1019.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz042
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jack A Brand & Annalise C Naimo & Marcus Michelangeli & Jake M Martin & Andrew Sih & Bob B M Wong & David G Chapple, 2021. "Population differences in the effect of context on personality in an invasive lizard," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1363-1371.
    2. Cammy Beyts & Maddalena Cella & Nick Colegrave & Roger Downie & Julien G A Martin & Patrick Walsh, 2023. "The effect of heterospecific and conspecific competition on inter-individual differences in tungara frog tadpole (Engystomops pustulosus) behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(2), pages 210-222.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:1012-1019.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.