IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i2p383-392..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social context affects thermoregulation but not activity level during avian immune response

Author

Listed:
  • Grace J Vaziri
  • Manju M Johny
  • Petruţa C Caragea
  • James S Adelman

Abstract

Determining how an animal’s social context alters its immune responses will help us understand how pathogens impact individual health and spread within groups. Several studies have shown that group-housed animals can suppress components of the acute phase immune response, specifically sickness behaviors like lethargy. However, we do not know whether individuals alter sickness behaviors or other components of the acute phase response, including thermoregulation, in response to the infection status of other group members. We used automated radio telemetry on captive house sparrows (Passer domesticus) to test whether sickness behaviors and thermoregulation differed during immune challenge under 2 social contexts: 1) all of the flock inoculated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a non-replicating component of gram-negative bacterial cell walls, or 2) half of the flock inoculated. We predicted that with half of the flock inoculated, LPS-treated birds would be under more pressure to maintain competitive behaviors, so would suppress components of the acute phase response. As we predicted, LPS-inoculated birds showed less pronounced heterothermia (fever) when housed with a mixture of inoculated and healthy flockmates. In contrast, LPS-inoculated birds exhibited similar degrees of lethargy regardless of the infection status of their flockmates. Our results show that the infection status of an individual’s social group did exert an effect on the acute phase response but surprisingly did not impact the expression of lethargy, a canonical sickness behavior. Determining the mechanisms underlying these responses will require testing additional social contexts with different ratios of infected to uninfected birds. Infection and sickness have direct physiological costs and indirect behavioral costs. Accordingly, many animals, including birds, can mask their signs of illness around healthy individuals, behaving normally despite infection. But if everyone is sick, is it still worth masking your behavioral symptoms? We showed that house sparrows mounting an immune response do not change their behaviors based on how many other birds around them are also sick. Curiously, though, they do exhibit different fever responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace J Vaziri & Manju M Johny & Petruţa C Caragea & James S Adelman, 2019. "Social context affects thermoregulation but not activity level during avian immune response," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(2), pages 383-392.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:2:p:383-392.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ary177
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:2:p:383-392.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.