IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i5p1441-1448..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Criteria for host selection in a brood parasite vary depending on parasitism rate

Author

Listed:
  • Mercedes Molina-Morales
  • Juan Gabriel Martínez
  • Jesús M. Avilés

Abstract

Avian brood parasites leave parental care of their offspring to unrelated foster parents; therefore, their fitness will closely relate to their efficiency in selecting the best host. Empirical studies have shown that parasitism is not random, although it is yet unclear if this results from strategic choices of better quality hosts by brood parasites or can be a consequence of hosts and/or nests characteristics that make them more exposed to parasitism. Here, we hypothesize that the optimal strategy of host use for a brood parasite may switch depending on fluctuations in the relative abundance of parasites with respect to hosts and predict that parasites should more likely select phenotypic traits indicating host quality when this is relatively low (i.e., many available host nests for each parasite at a given time). In an 8-year study of magpie Pica pica hosts parasitized by great spotted cuckoos Clamator glandarius, we have found that in years with lower than average parasitism bigger magpie nests were more likely parasitized than smaller ones, whereas in years with higher than average parasitism big and small magpie nests had a similar chance of being parasitized. Because nest size is a postmating sexually selected signal revealing parental abilities in magpies that can be used as a target to choose profitable hosts by cuckoos, our findings support the hypothesis that active selection will become a more prevalent great spotted cuckoo laying strategy when cuckoos have a larger availability of host nests to choose among.

Suggested Citation

  • Mercedes Molina-Morales & Juan Gabriel Martínez & Jesús M. Avilés, 2016. "Criteria for host selection in a brood parasite vary depending on parasitism rate," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(5), pages 1441-1448.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1441-1448.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arw066
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1441-1448.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.