IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i5p1432-1440..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of experimental human approaches on escape behavior in Thomson’s gazelle (Eudorcas thomsonii)

Author

Listed:
  • Tomas Holmern
  • Trine Hay Setsaas
  • Claudia Melis
  • Jarle Tufto
  • Eivin Røskaft

Abstract

Prey rely on making correct risk assessments when approached by potential predators in order to stay alive. We conducted experimental human approaches with different simulated threat levels toward solitary adult male Thomson’s gazelles, that were located in open grassland. We measured individuals flight initiation distance (FID), distance fled, escape speed, and the distance between the location where the focal individual had stopped to flee and where the human stopped the approach (termed safety distance). Multivariate analyses revealed an overall significant effect of starting distance, alertness, and time of day, but no statistical effect was found for approach speed on the multivariate response. The individual responses showed a significant positive effect of starting distance on both FID and safety distance. We also found a novel unimodal effect of time on FID. Finally, alertness and approach speed only had a significant effect on safety distance, where faster approaches and individuals that displayed alert behavior had shorter safety distances. Together, these findings indicate support for the "flush early and avoid the rush" hypothesis, shows the necessity of using starting distance, alertness, and time as covariates when testing the effects of threat level, and demonstrate the usefulness of the new metric safety distance.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomas Holmern & Trine Hay Setsaas & Claudia Melis & Jarle Tufto & Eivin Røskaft, 2016. "Effects of experimental human approaches on escape behavior in Thomson’s gazelle (Eudorcas thomsonii)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(5), pages 1432-1440.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1432-1440.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arw052
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1432-1440.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.