IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i2p567-574..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of wind and fuel stores on stopover departure behavior across a migratory barrier

Author

Listed:
  • Bryant C. Dossman
  • Greg W. Mitchell
  • D. Ryan Norris
  • Philip D. Taylor
  • Christopher G. Guglielmo
  • Stephen N. Matthews
  • Paul G. Rodewald

Abstract

During annual migrations between breeding and nonbreeding grounds, billions of land birds encounter migratory barriers en route. Although birds are thought to be more selective (i.e., cross under favorable wind conditions) and spend more time refueling at stopover sites when confronted with these barriers, there is no direct evidence to support these hypotheses. Using 2 automated radio-telemetry arrays at stopover sites situated before (south of) and after (north of) a large ecological barrier (Lake Erie), we tracked departure decisions of American redstarts Setophaga ruticilla and yellow-rumped (myrtle) warblers Setophaga coronata coronata during spring migration. We found evidence that condition, age, and tailwind assistance were all positively correlated with the likelihood of departure. Interestingly, these patterns did not differ between species, with presumably differing migratory tactics, nor across sites, suggesting that during spring migration, migratory songbirds may follow general rules for departure from stopover sites, despite varying ecological and life-history contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryant C. Dossman & Greg W. Mitchell & D. Ryan Norris & Philip D. Taylor & Christopher G. Guglielmo & Stephen N. Matthews & Paul G. Rodewald, 2016. "The effects of wind and fuel stores on stopover departure behavior across a migratory barrier," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(2), pages 567-574.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:567-574.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv189
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:567-574.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.