IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i1p55-61..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female guppies can recognize kin but only avoid incest when previously mated

Author

Listed:
  • Mitchel J. Daniel
  • F. Helen Rodd

Abstract

Kin recognition plays a key role in inbreeding avoidance for taxa from all major animal groups; however, perplexingly, a number of species, for which the risks and costs of inbreeding are high, do not discriminate against relatives in mate choice experiments. We tested a possible explanation for this paradox: most tests of inbreeding avoidance have used virgin females, but theory predicts that virgin females should first mate indiscriminately to gain reproductive assurance and, only subsequently, become choosy. To test this idea, we used the Trinidadian guppy, which suffers inbreeding depression but for which evidence for kin recognition is equivocal. We manipulated rearing environment to disentangle 2 forms of kin recognition and tested the preferences of both virgin and nonvirgin females. As predicted, virgins were indiscriminate in their mate choice. Nonvirgins, in contrast, expressed strong preferences for unfamiliar and unrelated males. Therefore, female guppies recognize kin in a mate choice context but become selective only once reproductively assured. This dynamic likely increases population fitness in newly colonized or small, at-risk populations by ensuring that virgins mate even when only unfamiliar or unrelated males are available. Our findings suggest that inbreeding avoidance may be more common than previously thought and that the use of virgin females can sometimes prevent the detection of powerful mate preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitchel J. Daniel & F. Helen Rodd, 2016. "Female guppies can recognize kin but only avoid incest when previously mated," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 55-61.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:55-61.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv122
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:55-61.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.