IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i1p279-286..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Yellow warbler defenses are retained in the absence of brood parasitism but enhanced by experience with cowbirds

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. Kuehn
  • Brian D. Peer
  • Robert A. McCleery
  • Stephen I. Rothstein

Abstract

Yellow warblers, Setophaga petechia, respond to brood parasitic brown-headed cowbirds, Molothrus ater, by giving "seet" alarm calls and rushing to protect their nests. These responses are typically given in populations sympatric with cowbirds, but rarely in allopatric populations. Whether the lower expression in allopatry has a genetic basis or instead could be explained by behavioral plasticity has not been investigated. We found that warblers exposed to cowbirds in Montana (sympatric) responded significantly more often to cowbird models with seet calls (85.7%) and nest protection behavior (80.0%) than conspecifics breeding in long-term isolation from cowbirds in Alaska (allopatric, 27.3% and 16.7%, respectively). Warblers breeding in Idaho, which were locally isolated from cowbirds (naive) but presumed to be genetically similar to nearby parasitized warblers, were significantly less likely than sympatric warblers to respond to cowbird models with seet calls (30.3%) and nest protection (17.3%). The lower responsiveness of naive warblers implies behavioral plasticity in trait expression, indicating that the lower responsiveness of allopatric warblers relative to sympatric warblers could be explained entirely by plasticity. The lower expression of these defenses in the absence of cowbirds may contribute to their persistence by minimizing potentially costly recognition errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. Kuehn & Brian D. Peer & Robert A. McCleery & Stephen I. Rothstein, 2016. "Yellow warbler defenses are retained in the absence of brood parasitism but enhanced by experience with cowbirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 279-286.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:279-286.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv145
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:279-286.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.