IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i1p245-251..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flesh flies regulate the consumption of 3 macronutrients to maximize lifespan and egg production

Author

Listed:
  • Jesse Hawley
  • Stephen J. Simpson
  • Shawn M. Wilder

Abstract

Dietary macronutrient balance has been shown to have large effects on the growth, reproduction, and survival of a wide range of animals. Yet, most studies of dietary nutrient balance are limited to pairs of nutrients even though food items can differ in their concentrations of all 3 macronutrients. We used a right-angled mixture triangle design to quantify the self-selected nutrient intake of flesh flies, Sarcophaga crassipalpis, and to test the separate and interactive effects of all 3 macronutrients on lifespan and lifetime egg production. Flesh flies presented with 3 food dishes, each biased in 1 macronutrient, self-selected a nutrient intake that was highly carbohydrate-biased. When maintained on 1 of 7 diets with fixed macronutrient mixtures, flies maximized both lifespan and lifetime egg production on carbohydrate-biased diets. Despite overwhelming effects of carbohydrates on fitness, there were subtle but significant interactions between carbohydrate and lipid for lifespan and carbohydrate and protein for egg production. These results demonstrate that flesh flies are able to balance their intake of all 3 macronutrients simultaneously to reach an intake at which they achieve high fitness. Furthermore, the effects of carbohydrate and protein on the fitness of flesh flies were similar to that of fruit flies (Bactrocera tryoni) and vinegar flies (Drosophila melanogaster). This suggests that regardless of whether they feed on plant tissue or animal flesh as larvae, flies converge on similar dietary requirements as adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesse Hawley & Stephen J. Simpson & Shawn M. Wilder, 2016. "Flesh flies regulate the consumption of 3 macronutrients to maximize lifespan and egg production," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 245-251.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:245-251.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv151
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:245-251.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.