IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i1p228-236..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An experimental test of duet function in a fairy-wren (Malurus) with moderate cuckoldry rates

Author

Listed:
  • Jenélle Dowling
  • Michael S. Webster

Abstract

Individuals within social groups commonly combine vocal signals, forming duets. Although these displays have been described across taxa, their function is not fully understood. In birds, territory defense is a well-supported function of duetting, but additional functions are likely. Extrapair paternity (EPP) is common in birds, and males at risk of cuckoldry are expected to guard paternity in many ways, possibly including acoustic guarding with duets. Theoretical models predict species with moderate-to-high EPP rates will invest most in paternity-guarding, yet few studies have investigated duet function in such species. We conducted a dual-speaker playback experiment to test duet function in the red-backed fairy-wren, Malurus melanocephalus, which has moderately high EPP rates. Breeding groups were presented with 3 playback treatments: male solo, female solo, and duet. The territory defense hypothesis predicts pairs will respond aggressively and sing duets during duet playback in early breeding stages but predicts no same-sex bias in response to male/female songs. Acoustic paternity-guarding predicts males will duet with mates during male playback and in their mate’s receptive stage, and they will bias aggression toward the speaker playing male song. Focal pairs duetted more during playback than controls and most during pre-breeding. Males and females responded more strongly to duet than solo playback, especially during pre-breeding, but neither showed same-sex response bias. Results most strongly supported the territory defense hypothesis, providing evidence that, despite cuckoldry risk, vocal duets were not used primarily for paternity-guarding. This helps us toward understanding the function of vocal displays across different mating systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenélle Dowling & Michael S. Webster, 2016. "An experimental test of duet function in a fairy-wren (Malurus) with moderate cuckoldry rates," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 228-236.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:228-236.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv144
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emma I. Greig & Michael S. Webster, 2013. "Spatial decoupling of song and plumage generates novel phenotypes between 2 avian subspecies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 1004-1013.
    2. Jordan Karubian & T. Scott Sillett & Michael S. Webster, 2008. "The effects of delayed plumage maturation on aggression and survival in male red-backed fairy-wrens," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(3), pages 508-516.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea S. Grunst & John T. Rotenberry & Melissa L. Grunst, 2014. "Age-dependent relationships between multiple sexual pigments and condition in males and females," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(2), pages 276-287.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:228-236.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.