IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i1p196-203..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nest predation risk, but not demography, drives dynamics of conspecific brood parasitism

Author

Listed:
  • Hannu Pöysä
  • Antti Paasivaara

Abstract

Conspecific brood parasitism (CBP) is an alternative reproductive tactic in several animal taxa. Although various behavioral aspects related to CBP have been studied in several species, understanding spatial and temporal dynamics of CBP and its drivers is still limited. We studied roles of nest predation risk and demography as possible drivers of dynamics of CBP in common goldeneyes (Bucephala clangula), a cavity-nesting duck. We provided decoy nests for parasitic laying in an experimental setting of 15 lakes for 7 consecutive years irrespective of local nest predation, being thus able to control for effects of predation-determined host nest availability. Individual parasites were recognized using protein fingerprints from egg albumen of parasitic eggs laid in the decoy nests. We found considerable spatial and temporal variation in the frequency of CBP within the experimental setting. Variation in CBP was driven by nest predation risk: the rate of CBP tracked the number of nonpredated nesting attempts at the lakes during the previous year. Neither variation in lake-specific number of potential homing first-time breeding females (i.e., demography) nor variation in lake-specific number of nesting females present explained the variation in lake-specific frequency of CBP. Our findings provide evidence that parasitically laying females pursue a genuine and flexible safety-seeking tactic in nest selection and that nest predation risk drives spatial and temporal dynamics of CBP.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannu Pöysä & Antti Paasivaara, 2016. "Nest predation risk, but not demography, drives dynamics of conspecific brood parasitism," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 196-203.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:196-203.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv139
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:196-203.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.