IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i1p109-117..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reproduction and immunity trade-offs constrain mating signals and nuptial gift size in a bushcricket

Author

Listed:
  • Flavia Barbosa
  • Darren Rebar
  • Michael D. Greenfield

Abstract

Reproduction and immunity often require significant energetic investment and as a result, trade-offs may occur between them. Reproduction is particularly costly for males of the bushcricket Ephippiger diurnus: not only do they produce loud advertisement calls for long periods of time to attract mates but also they offer females a large nuptial gift, a spermatophore, that can be up to 40% of their body weight. Song traits and spermatophore size vary among males, implying that males may differ in their overall reproductive effort or in how their effort is allocated. Males are long-lived, suggesting that survival traits such as immunity may be particularly critical in fitness. Here, we tested the hypothesis that trade-offs exist between reproductive effort and immune response in E. diurnus and that such trade-offs may constrain male mating calls and nuptial gift size. We investigated the relationship between call syllable number, spermatophore size, and immune response in field-collected individuals. We found an inverse relationship in all pairwise comparisons of call syllable number, spermatophore size, and immune response, as well as between overall reproductive effort and immune response. Our results suggest that males exhibit different energy allocation strategies and that their trade-offs ultimately constrain signal evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Flavia Barbosa & Darren Rebar & Michael D. Greenfield, 2016. "Reproduction and immunity trade-offs constrain mating signals and nuptial gift size in a bushcricket," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 109-117.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:109-117.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv131
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:1:p:109-117.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.