IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i4p1226-1235..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical test of 2-dimensional signal detection theory applied to Batesian mimicry

Author

Listed:
  • David W. Kikuchi
  • Gaurav Malick
  • Richard J. Webster
  • Emilee Whissell
  • Thomas N. Sherratt

Abstract

Signal detection theory (SDT) has been invoked to help explain why imperfect mimics of particularly unprofitable or abundant models might experience no further selection to improve their mimicry. However, most tests of SDT have focused on single dimensions of mimetic phenotypes, or used multivariate techniques to compress many dimensions of phenotype into a single scale. Here, we explicitly tested SDT in both one and two dimensions by asking human subjects to discriminate computer-generated mimics and models that varied continuously in both size and/or color. We arrived at two major conclusions. First, although subjects can use prey size or color to help discriminate profitable and unprofitable prey that vary in only one dimension, responses of subjects to prey that vary in two dimensions are poorly represented by multidimensional SDT. Second, because different individuals within groups may use different strategies, the behavior of groups is often better fit by more complex models. In general, humans give more weight to color when making discriminations than is optimal. This bias may indicate that they believe that color has higher relative validity than size. More studies on the behavior of natural predators when foraging on multidimensional prey are urgently needed.

Suggested Citation

  • David W. Kikuchi & Gaurav Malick & Richard J. Webster & Emilee Whissell & Thomas N. Sherratt, 2015. "An empirical test of 2-dimensional signal detection theory applied to Batesian mimicry," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(4), pages 1226-1235.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:1226-1235.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv072
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:1226-1235.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.