IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i3p866-876..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who swarms with whom? Group dynamics of Myotis bats during autumn swarming

Author

Listed:
  • Lynne E. Burns
  • Hugh G. Broders

Abstract

For many animal taxa, group-living is a strategy where the cohesion provided by groups confers fitness benefits to individuals. Bats are highly gregarious with many species living in groups with complex social structures. During the summer, many temperate species are sexually segregated among roosts where females have been found to exhibit dynamic social structures and males remain understudied. We studied the group dynamics of little brown and northern Myotis bats (Myotis lucifugus and Myotis septentrionalis) during autumn swarming, a period for which social interactions are largely unknown. Using capture–mark–recapture surveys, we characterized the occurrence and frequency of age and sex groups occurring at swarms. Within a night, young-of-the-year associated more often with other bats than did adult males and females. Further, they associated more often with other young-of-the-year than adults. We found no evidence to support the maternal guidance hypothesis predicting that there would be associations between mother–offspring pairs. Adult male and female bats associated less frequently with each other and were captured alone most often. When males were captured in groups, these groups were more likely to be composed of multiple males and in M. lucifugus, males had preferred male associates they grouped with over multiple nights. Groups formed during the autumn swarming season may represent cohort groups of young bats learning of the location of sites and groups of males that are potentially cooperating to secure more mating opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynne E. Burns & Hugh G. Broders, 2015. "Who swarms with whom? Group dynamics of Myotis bats during autumn swarming," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(3), pages 866-876.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:3:p:866-876.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:3:p:866-876.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.