IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i2p639-646..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shy female kangaroos seek safety in numbers and have fewer preferred friendships

Author

Listed:
  • Emily C. Best
  • Simon P. Blomberg
  • Anne W. Goldizen

Abstract

Personality and behavioral syndromes are of significant interest to a wide range of biological disciplines. Recent research using network analysis techniques has revealed widespread variation among individuals in sociability, which is a major axis of personality that creates the social microenvironment in which individuals express all other behaviors. We investigated the relationship between sociability and boldness, another fundamental personality axis, using a wild population of eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) tested in their natural environment. We studied 2 dimensions of sociability (grouping behavior and association patterns). Over 2 years we found significant within-individual consistency and interindividual variation in the foraging group sizes of 171 females. Network analysis comparisons of 103 females between the years, using HWIG (an association index that controls for gregariousness), showed that individuals were also highly consistent in their social network measures. We tested the boldness of 51 of these females 6–21 times each over 18 months, using flight initiation distance tests; individuals were also highly consistent in this measure of personality. Shy females had significantly larger mean foraging group sizes. After controlling for gregariousness and space use, shy females had fewer preferred associates than bolder females. Therefore, boldness can have an important influence on the size and composition of foraging groups and thus social networks, in wild mammals.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily C. Best & Simon P. Blomberg & Anne W. Goldizen, 2015. "Shy female kangaroos seek safety in numbers and have fewer preferred friendships," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 639-646.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:639-646.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:639-646.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.