IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i2p617-624..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The complexity of male reproductive success: effects of nutrition, morphology, and experience

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Fricke
  • Margo I. Adler
  • Robert C. Brooks
  • Russell Bonduriansky

Abstract

Many studies have attempted to account for variation in male reproductive success by quantifying a single trait such as an ornament or a behavior, but male reproductive performance may be determined by a number of interacting traits. Although developmental nutrition is often a major determinant of adult body size and secondary sexual trait expression, other factors—such as residual shape variation and prior experience—may also exert independent effects on male reproductive success. Here, we studied how male sexual-trait expression, as manipulated by larval diet quality, and experience in direct male–male competition, affected male reproductive success in the sexually dimorphic neriid fly Telostylinus angusticollis. Among competing males matched by body size, individuals with relatively longer antennae (used as weapons) were more likely to win and also achieved matings faster. Unexpectedly, males reared on a poor larval diet and those that had previously lost in male–male combat appeared to invest more in some aspects of reproduction as indicated by a longer mating duration and a higher subsequent egg-hatching rate. Our findings demonstrate the complexity of male reproductive success, indicating that male developmental nutrition as well as morphological variation, and prior adult competitive experience interact in a complex manner to influence overall reproductive performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Fricke & Margo I. Adler & Robert C. Brooks & Russell Bonduriansky, 2015. "The complexity of male reproductive success: effects of nutrition, morphology, and experience," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 617-624.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:617-624.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru240
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:617-624.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.