IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i2p527-532..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A larger brain confers a benefit in a spatial mate search learning task in male guppies

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Kotrschal
  • Alberto Corral-Lopez
  • Mirjam Amcoff
  • Niclas Kolm

Abstract

Brain size varies dramatically among vertebrates, and selection for increased cognitive abilities is thought to be the key force underlying the evolution of a large brain. Indeed, numerous comparative studies suggest positive relationships between cognitively demanding aspects of behavior and brain size controlled for body size. However, experimental evidence for the link between relative brain size and cognitive ability is surprisingly scarce and to date stems from a single study on brain size selected guppies (Poecilia reticulata), where large-brained females were shown to outperform small-brained females in a numerical learning assay. Because the results were inconclusive for males in that study, we here use a more ecologically relevant test of male cognitive ability to investigate whether or not a relatively larger brain increases cognitive ability also in males. We compared mate search ability of these artificially selected large- and small-brained males in a maze and found that large-brained males were faster at learning to find a female in a maze. Large-brained males decreased the time spent navigating the maze faster than small-brained males and were nearly twice as fast through the maze after 2 weeks of training. Our results support that relatively larger brains are better also for males in some contexts, which further substantiates that variation in vertebrate brain size is generated through the balance between energetic costs and cognitive benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Kotrschal & Alberto Corral-Lopez & Mirjam Amcoff & Niclas Kolm, 2015. "A larger brain confers a benefit in a spatial mate search learning task in male guppies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 527-532.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:527-532.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru227
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hannah De Waele & Catarina Vila Pouca & Dimphy van Boerdonk & Ewoud Luiten & Lisanne M Leenheer & David Mitchell & Regina Vega-Trejo & Alexander Kotrschal, 2022. "Jumping out of trouble: evidence for a cognitive map in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) [Animal navigation]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(6), pages 1161-1169.
    2. Rebecca M McNeil & Alessandro Devigili & Niclas Kolm & John L Fitzpatrick, 2021. "Does brain size affect mate choice? An experimental examination in pygmy halfbeaks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1103-1113.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:527-532.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.