IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i5p1058-1063..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forewarned is forearmed: aggression and information use determine fitness costs of slave raids

Author

Listed:
  • Isabelle Kleeberg
  • Tobias Pamminger
  • Evelien Jongepier
  • Mirjam Papenhagen
  • Susanne Foitzik

Abstract

Many animals use reliable indicators of upcoming events such as antagonistic interactions to prepare themselves. In group-living animals, not only the cue perceiving individuals are involved in mobilization, but the entire group can use this information. In this study, we analyze whether social insects, which perceive reliable information on an upcoming social parasite attack, can use this knowledge to better defend their colony. We focus on the interaction between the ant Temnothorax longispinosus and the slave-making ant Protomognathus americanus, which conducts destructive raids on host colonies to steal their brood. As a behavioral defense, host colonies show aggression, which has a constitutive and inducible component: earlier studies demonstrated both behavioral consistency and an increase in aggression after slavemaker contact. Here, we analyze the fitness benefits of aggression in the context of slave raids. Aggression only facilitated host colony defense if the hosts were informed about a pending slave raid: slavemaker scouts were not only less likely to enter forewarned host colonies, but more aggressive colonies who previously encountered a slavemaker saved a higher fraction of their brood. We thus demonstrate that the fitness costs of raids depend on an interaction between the collective defense abilities and reliable information on impending dangers.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabelle Kleeberg & Tobias Pamminger & Evelien Jongepier & Mirjam Papenhagen & Susanne Foitzik, 2014. "Forewarned is forearmed: aggression and information use determine fitness costs of slave raids," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1058-1063.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:5:p:1058-1063.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru084
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:5:p:1058-1063.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.