Author
Listed:
- Mirre J.P. Simons
- Michael Briga
- Bas Leenknegt
- Simon Verhulst
Abstract
Carotenoid-dependent sexual coloration is one of the best-studied sexual signals, but how the honesty of such signals is maintained remains uncertain. The main hypotheses focus on acquisition limits and physiological use of carotenoids in immune function and regulating oxidative stress. A hypothesis that has received less attention states that carotenoids can also be detrimental, depending on an animal’s state. Hence, carotenoid-dependent signals may be a handicap, signaling the ability to evade or tolerate detrimental effects of carotenoids. To investigate this hypothesis, we examined the effects of carotenoid supplementation on subsequent reproduction in zebra finches in 2 different foraging environments ("easy" and "hard"), thereby generating variation in physiological state. We find support for context-dependent negative effects of carotenoid supplementation on subsequent laying latency and on total number of eggs laid: carotenoids had a detrimental effect in the "easy" conditions and a beneficial effect in the "hard" conditions. Thus, our results support the hypothesis that carotenoids can have context-dependent detrimental effects. Dissecting the relative contribution of the different mutually nonexclusive honesty mechanisms—acquisition, physiological benefits, and context-dependent detrimental effects of carotenoids—maintaining carotenoid-dependent signal honesty will be an exciting challenge.
Suggested Citation
Mirre J.P. Simons & Michael Briga & Bas Leenknegt & Simon Verhulst, 2014.
"Context-dependent effects of carotenoid supplementation on reproduction in zebra finches,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 945-950.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:945-950.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- repec:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:2:p:233-236. is not listed on IDEAS
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:945-950.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.