IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i2p328-334..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sunbirds increase foraging success by using color as a cue for nectar quality

Author

Listed:
  • Maxine Whitfield
  • Angela Köhler
  • Susan W. Nicolson

Abstract

Nectar concentration and composition vary widely between plant species. Nectarivorous birds that associate floral characteristics with nectar quality may be able to avoid less rewarding flowers and therefore forage more efficiently. We assessed the abilities of amethyst sunbirds (Chalcomitra amethystina) to utilize color cues to discriminate between concentrated (1M) and dilute (0.25M) sucrose solutions. In an outdoor aviary, birds were presented with 3 rich feeders among 6 poor feeders on a feeding board. Following the assessment of baseline performance with optically identical feeders, color cues were added to the feeders for a 6-h training period. To assess the retention of learnt visual cues, birds were tested 1 and 7 days after the training. Observations lasted for 3h, with feeders being rearranged every 30min to minimize spatial learning. In the absence of color cues, birds selected feeders randomly, but when color cues were available, they visited more rich than poor feeders. This more rapid identification of rich feeders resulted in a decrease in feeding duration and feeding frequency compared with the baseline performance. Energy uptake from rich feeders and therefore the rate of energy gain increased when birds foraged with color cues. No differences were found between Days 1 and 7 after training. Total energy intake decreased with visual cues, which may indicate a reduction in foraging costs when cues allow for location of rewarding feeders. Our findings demonstrate that sunbirds forage more efficiently with cues, which may lead to increased fitness.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxine Whitfield & Angela Köhler & Susan W. Nicolson, 2014. "Sunbirds increase foraging success by using color as a cue for nectar quality," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(2), pages 328-334.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:2:p:328-334.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art115
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ida E. Bacon & T. Andrew Hurly & Susan Healy, 2010. "Both the past and the present affect risk-sensitive decisions of foraging rufous hummingbirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(3), pages 626-632.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clare Andrews & Daniel Nettle & Sophie Reichert & Tom Bedford & Pat Monaghan & Melissa Bateson, 2018. "A marker of biological ageing predicts adult risk preference in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(3), pages 589-597.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:2:p:328-334.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.