IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i1p206-215..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do scatter hoarders trade off increased predation risks for lower rates of cache pilferage?

Author

Listed:
  • Michael A. Steele
  • Thomas A. Contreras
  • Leila Z. Hadj-Chikh
  • Salvatore J. Agosta
  • Peter D. Smallwood
  • Chioma N. Tomlinson

Abstract

Scatter hoarding is a common food-hoarding strategy of many granivores, known to significantly contribute to seed dispersal. Models of scatter hoarding typically hold that the spatial distribution of the scatter hoards made by birds and mammals result from a trade-off between the energetic cost of spacing caches and the increased risk of pilferage as cache densities increase. Here, we present evidence from 3 field experiments that eastern gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) rely on an alternative strategy in which preferred food items are stored in open habitats, beyond tree crowns, where the probability of predation is higher but the risk of cache pilferage is also reduced (hereafter the habitat structure hypothesis). In the first 2 experiments, squirrels cached larger, more profitable acorns at significantly greater distances from canopy edges than smaller acorns, which were more often cached under trees. In the third experiment, in which we tested the effects of both tree canopy cover and cache density on pilferage rates, we found no effect of density on pilferage rates but significantly higher pilferage rates under canopy cover. Our results indicate that habitat heterogeneity, potentially as it relates to predation risks, influences the distribution of scatter-hoarded seeds, with more profitable seeds placed in more open vegetation beyond the shadow of parent plants. We suggest that this behavior may reflect a general strategy of other scatter-hoarding mammals and birds that likely increases the probability of dispersal and establishment of seeds.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael A. Steele & Thomas A. Contreras & Leila Z. Hadj-Chikh & Salvatore J. Agosta & Peter D. Smallwood & Chioma N. Tomlinson, 2014. "Do scatter hoarders trade off increased predation risks for lower rates of cache pilferage?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 206-215.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:1:p:206-215.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art107
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mikel M Delgado & Molly Nicholas & Daniel J Petrie & Lucia F Jacobs, 2014. "Fox Squirrels Match Food Assessment and Cache Effort to Value and Scarcity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-8, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:1:p:206-215.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.