IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i1p165-171..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Offspring sex ratio varies with clutch size for female house wrens induced to lay supernumerary eggs

Author

Listed:
  • E. Keith Bowers
  • Charles F. Thompson
  • Scott K. Sakaluk

Abstract

Theory predicts that a mother’s ability to produce high-quality offspring should influence whether she produces sons or daughters. We tested this hypothesis in house wrens (Troglodytes aedon) using a within-clutch design in which we induced females to produce more eggs (8–10 eggs) than they normally would (6 or 7 eggs) to determine whether maternal effort and the allocation of resources to supernumerary eggs (those laid beyond the usual number) influence the offspring sex ratio. At the clutch level, we predicted that high-quality females, as defined by their ability to produce supernumerary eggs in response to egg removal, would overproduce sons relative to females treated the same way but producing fewer eggs. At the level of the egg, we predicted that supernumerary eggs would more likely contain daughters than sons. As predicted, females producing extralarge clutches overproduced sons and those producing smaller clutches produced relatively more daughters. Last-laid eggs were also more likely to contain daughters than earlier-laid eggs although there was no difference in the mass of eggs containing males and females. These results suggest that mothers adjust the sex of their offspring strategically to maximize fitness.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Keith Bowers & Charles F. Thompson & Scott K. Sakaluk, 2014. "Offspring sex ratio varies with clutch size for female house wrens induced to lay supernumerary eggs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 165-171.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:1:p:165-171.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art100
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:1:p:165-171.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.