IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i5p1260-1270..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mating system and intrapatch mobility delay inbreeding in fragmented populations of a gecko

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Lange
  • Bernd Gruber
  • Klaus Henle
  • Stephen D. Sarre
  • Marion Hoehn

Abstract

Habitat fragmentation can cause high levels of inbreeding within populations by creating small isolated populations and therefore can affect population survival. While most genetic studies of fragmented systems focus on the impact of habitat fragmentation on interpatch patterns or processes, here we focus on inbreeding (avoidance) processes within patches. We used both genetic and mark-recapture data to study within-patch processes in fragmented and continuous populations of the gecko Oedura reticulata in the Western Australian Wheatbelt. Our results revealed that O. reticulata in fragments and continuous populations alike share a promiscuous mating system (involving both polygyny and polyandry) and exhibit no detectable difference in mean levels of relatedness. However, we also found that proportions of full- and half-sib matings were higher in the habitat fragments, subadults disperse further, and all demographic classes move further and more frequently. We contend that the net result of this combination of promiscuity and greater movement is that small isolated populations have been able to retain mean levels of relatedness similar to those in nearby continuous habitat despite fragmentation and close to complete isolation over generations. It is likely that these behavioral changes have ameliorated some of the genetic effects caused by habitat fragmentation, potentially delaying reductions in the fitness effects expected from fragmentation into small populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Lange & Bernd Gruber & Klaus Henle & Stephen D. Sarre & Marion Hoehn, 2013. "Mating system and intrapatch mobility delay inbreeding in fragmented populations of a gecko," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1260-1270.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:5:p:1260-1270.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:5:p:1260-1270.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.