IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i5p1199-1204..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Male choice of mates and mating resourcesin the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus)

Author

Listed:
  • Mara Casalini
  • Martin Reichard
  • André Phillips
  • Carl Smith

Abstract

The traditional view of sexual selection acting wholly through male–male competition and female choice has been challenged in recent years. An increasing body of experimental work has demonstrated a role for male choosiness over mates, influenced by cues, such as female body size, that correlate with fecundity. In addition, in resource-based mating systems, male preference for resources required for reproduction is predicted to match those of females. Using the rose bitterling, Rhodeus ocellatus, a fish that uses living freshwater mussels for oviposition, we investigated male response to females that varied in size and to oviposition sites that varied in quality. Male courtship behavior directed at females, and aggression directed at rivals, did not vary with female size. The lack of predicted male response, which contrasts with other species, was explained by the absence of a relationship between female size and either batch fecundity or egg size, stemming from constraints on these variables imposed by oviposition in the gill cavities of mussels. When presented with spawning sites that contrasted in quality, male preferences for spawning sites were inconsistent: males lacked a preference for high-quality sites when no female was present but showed strong preferences for high-quality sites that matched the preferences of females. These results indicate constraints on the evolution of male mate choice and divergence in selection acting on the sexes in making oviposition decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mara Casalini & Martin Reichard & André Phillips & Carl Smith, 2013. "Male choice of mates and mating resourcesin the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1199-1204.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:5:p:1199-1204.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art050
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:5:p:1199-1204.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.