IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i4p842-845..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An experimental test of the Westermarck effect: sex differences in inbreeding avoidance

Author

Listed:
  • Urszula M. Marcinkowska
  • Fhionna R. Moore
  • Markus J. Rantala

Abstract

In order to avoid inbreeding, humans and other animals develop a strong sexual aversion to individuals with whom they have lived closely in infancy and early childhood (usually biological siblings), a phenomenon called the "Westermarck effect" or negative sexual imprinting. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, however, remain unclear. For example, it is not known whether negative imprinting is based only on actual sexual aversion to brothers and sisters or also on generalizing the traits of their siblings to nonkin. If imprinting is more general, one could predict that people would avoid mating with all individuals that resemble their other-sex siblings. In our study, women rated morphed other-sex faces that resemble their siblings as significantly lower in sexual attractiveness than morphed faces on average, and the opposite effect was found in men—similarity to sibling increased perceived attractiveness. Interestingly, self-similarity did not influence the preferences of either men or women. These sex differences are consistent with parental investment theory, as females bear greater costs associated with inbreeding depression, perhaps explaining their deeper aversion toward engagement in sexual activities with male individuals who bear cues to relatedness. Furthermore, they indicate that faces resembling siblings are valid stimuli for investigating facial similarity preference.

Suggested Citation

  • Urszula M. Marcinkowska & Fhionna R. Moore & Markus J. Rantala, 2013. "An experimental test of the Westermarck effect: sex differences in inbreeding avoidance," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 842-845.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:4:p:842-845.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:4:p:842-845.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.