IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i4p812-818..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Amoeboid organism uses extracellular secretions to make smart foraging decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Chris R. Reid
  • Madeleine Beekman
  • Tanya Latty
  • Audrey Dussutour

Abstract

Many organisms avoid previously exploited patches to increase their foraging efficiency. Such avoidance behavior either requires systematic search, memorizing which patches have been visited, the deposition of a cue or signal that marks exploited patches, or a combination of these abilities. Usually we ascribe patch avoidance behavior to neurologically sophisticated organisms, but here we show identical behavior by a protist—the amoeboid slime mold Physarum polycephalum. This unicellular organism uses an externalized spatial memory system by depositing behind it a trail of extracellular slime. By subjecting amoebae to Y-maze choices, we found that the organism discriminates between slime deposited by conspecifics and heterospecifics and avoids areas where others have been previously. We argue that slime molds use the presence of extracellular slime to preferentially explore novel areas. If the organism perceives the presence of food, it will enter this area even if extracellular slime is present. Thus, extracellular slime does not serve as a repellent but as a cue that an area is most likely devoid of food sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris R. Reid & Madeleine Beekman & Tanya Latty & Audrey Dussutour, 2013. "Amoeboid organism uses extracellular secretions to make smart foraging decisions," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 812-818.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:4:p:812-818.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:4:p:812-818.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.