IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i4p1022-1029..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No benefits of polyandry to female green turtles

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy I. Wright
  • Wayne J. Fuller
  • Brendan J. Godley
  • Andrew McGowan
  • Tom Tregenza
  • Annette C. Broderick

Abstract

Multiple paternity is extremely common in natural populations of almost all reptiles studied to date, suggesting that pay-offs from polyandrous mating systems are important in these taxonomic groups. However, strong evidence in support of direct or indirect benefits to females is scarce. We examined the relationship between polyandry and components of female reproductive success and offspring fitness in the promiscuous green turtle (Chelonia mydas), a species that exhibits highly variable levels of multiple paternity. We did not detect any clear fitness benefits to polyandrous females in this study, and we discuss the potential of sexual conflict to influence female mating patterns in marine turtles. We show that polyandrous females produce significantly smaller clutches than monandrous females, highlighting a potential cost to polyandry in green turtles. Furthermore, multiple paternity was more common in returning females (recorded breeding in a previous season) than in females nesting for the first time at our study site, possibly reflecting increased encounter rates with males or sperm storage across breeding seasons. Our results reveal potentially complex influences of female traits, environment, and mating strategy on components of reproductive success, and we discuss the challenges associated with unraveling the costs and benefits of multiple mating in natural populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy I. Wright & Wayne J. Fuller & Brendan J. Godley & Andrew McGowan & Tom Tregenza & Annette C. Broderick, 2013. "No benefits of polyandry to female green turtles," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 1022-1029.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:4:p:1022-1029.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:4:p:1022-1029.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.