IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i2p331-333..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological and genetic distribution of eusociality: the case for kin selection

Author

Listed:
  • Emilio A. Herrera

Abstract

The evolutionary origin of eusociality has been the subject of much recent debate. In particular, the role of haplodiploidy has been questioned. With the aim of contributing to our understanding of this process, I propose the classification of eusociality into 2 kinds: female-only and male–female eusocial societies. The former occurs in haplodiploid animals, whereas the latter evolved in animals that live inside their food. In female-only eusociality, females are highly related because of haplodiploidy, whereas in male–female eusociality, living inside food promotes inbreeding among both male and female colony members, leading to both sexes being highly related. By reviewing the occurrence of these 2 kinds of extremely altruistic social systems, I argue that kin selection is crucial in both cases, giving support to the hypothesis that haplodiploidy was essential for the evolution of eusociality in animals possessing this trait.

Suggested Citation

  • Emilio A. Herrera, 2013. "Ecological and genetic distribution of eusociality: the case for kin selection," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 331-333.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:331-333.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars166
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:331-333.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.