IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i1p136-143..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are female offspring from a single-egg seabird more costly to raise?

Author

Listed:
  • Ditte Lyngbo Kristensen
  • Kjell Einar Erikstad
  • Tone Kristin Reiertsen
  • Truls Moum
  • Robert T. Barrett
  • Susanne Jenni-Eiermann

Abstract

If the fitness benefits gained from producing male and female offspring differ due to parental or environmental conditions, parents should adjust their level of investment accordingly. We studied sex allocation and reproductive investment in a population of common guillemots (Uria aalge) in 2 breeding seasons. The common guillemot is a single-egg species and the male is only slightly larger than the female implying small, if any differential costs of raising male and female offspring. We use 4 variables to characterize reproductive allocation: 1) sex of the chick at hatching, 2) adult male and female body condition, 3) baseline corticosterone (CORT) level of adults early and late in the chick-rearing period, and 4) body mass of the chicks just prior to fledging. Females that produced female offspring were in better body condition during early chick-rearing than those producing males and both parents raising a female offspring lost more body mass during the chick-rearing period. Female offspring were heavier than male offspring at the end of the chick-rearing period. Whereas hatching sex ratio was at unity in one of the years, it was strongly skewed toward females (72.5%) in the other year, and this pattern was consistent for a subset of pairs studied in both years. Early baseline CORT levels of adults were lower in the year when the sex ratio was skewed toward female offspring. We discuss this unexpected pattern of sex allocation in relation to variation in feeding conditions and the role of females in competing for good nesting sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Ditte Lyngbo Kristensen & Kjell Einar Erikstad & Tone Kristin Reiertsen & Truls Moum & Robert T. Barrett & Susanne Jenni-Eiermann, 2013. "Are female offspring from a single-egg seabird more costly to raise?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 136-143.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:136-143.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars144
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maureen L. Cameron-MacMillan & Carolyn J. Walsh & Sabina I. Wilhelm & Anne E. Storey, 2007. "Male chicks are more costly to rear than females in a monogamous seabird, the Common Murre," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(1), pages 81-85, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:136-143.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.