IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i6p1324-1329..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forewarned is forearmed: early signals of RHP predict opponent fatigue in hermit crab shell fights

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie L. Mowles
  • Mark Briffa

Abstract

In animal contests, opponents often perform repeated displays that are assumed to advertise their stamina and thereby fighting ability. However, given the severe time and energetic constraints imposed by such displays, we hypothesized that separate signals, performed early in a fight, may be used to reduce subsequent costs. We investigated whether the amount of cheliped flicks performed by a defending hermit crab during a prefight assessment period was indicative of the performance capacity of the defender and whether the frequency of flicks predicted the subsequent outcome of contests. Defenders that won fights by retaining their shells produced more vigorous flicking than those that were evicted. There was a strong trend between the rate of flicking performed by the defender and the maximum speed attained in performance capacity trials. Further, the rate of flicking was positively correlated with the duration of pauses that attackers left between bouts of shell-rapping, an indicator of attacker fatigue. Thus, these displays might inform the attacker about the potential persistence of the defender and therefore about the likely costs that the attacker will incur. Indeed, the rate of flicking performed by defenders early in the fight strongly predicts the eventual outcome of the contest.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie L. Mowles & Mark Briffa, 2012. "Forewarned is forearmed: early signals of RHP predict opponent fatigue in hermit crab shell fights," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1324-1329.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:1324-1329.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars124
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark E. Laidre, 2007. "Vulnerability and reliable signaling in conflicts between hermit crabs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(4), pages 736-741.
    2. Mark Briffa, 2006. "Signal residuals during shell fighting in hermit crabs: can costly signals be used deceptively?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(3), pages 510-514, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:1324-1329.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.