IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i5p1015-1021..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kinship, parentage, and temporal stability in nursery colonies of Leisler’s bat (Nyctalus leisleri)

Author

Listed:
  • Emma S. M. Boston
  • Stéphane G. Roué
  • W. I. Montgomery
  • Paulo A. Prodöhl

Abstract

Levels of genetic relatedness within bat colonies are often unknown, and consequently the reasons for group formation and social organization are unclear. The Leisler’s bat (Nyctalus leisleri), like most temperate bat species, forms nursery colonies in summer. We used microsatellite markers to examine identity and to attempt to estimate relatedness among females within a nursery colony, over 2 consecutive years, to ascertain whether females show kinship and natal philopatry, testing the hypothesis that this is the basis of colony formation. Parentage and relatedness of young born within a colony was assessed to investigate mating patterns via male reproductive skew and whether males achieve mating success within their natal colony. While there was evidence for female philopatry, levels of genetic relatedness within colonies were low. This suggests that kinship is not a major determinant in group formation, as roosts also comprise a large number of distant relatives or non-kin. Roost switching and gene flow are likely to be high. Both sexes reproduced in their first year, whereas males appear to be the more dispersive sex. We argue that the physical environment as well as information sharing provided by communal roosting are likely to be important factors for the formation of these large natal colonies in N. leisleri and possibly other lineages of bats.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma S. M. Boston & Stéphane G. Roué & W. I. Montgomery & Paulo A. Prodöhl, 2012. "Kinship, parentage, and temporal stability in nursery colonies of Leisler’s bat (Nyctalus leisleri)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 1015-1021.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:5:p:1015-1021.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars065
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:5:p:1015-1021.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.