IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i5p1009-1014..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Male courtship pheromones as indicators of genetic quality in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix)

Author

Listed:
  • Caitlin A. Kelly
  • Amanda J. Norbutus
  • Anthony F. Lagalante
  • Vikram K. Iyengar

Abstract

One of the fundamental issues regarding sexual selection is whether females select males based on signals that represent direct phenotypic or indirect genetic benefits. In Utetheisa ornatrix (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae), females choose males based on a courtship pheromone, hydroxydanaidal (HD), derived from defensive pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs). At mating, virgin males transfer a spermatophore whose contents are proportional to the HD titer and body size; as a result, females receive both phenotypic benefits (more nutrients and PAs) and genotypic benefits (genes for larger body size inherited by the offspring). Previous data from field-collected individuals, however, indicated that the HD signal of nonvirgin males may not correlate with the spermatophore contents. Using chemical analyses, we determined that the HD signal does not change based on mating history, thereby supporting the importance of HD in advertising a male’s genetic quality. Thus, male HD represents original body size and PA levels, and females, by choosing males based on this pheromone, are providing their offspring with genes to sequester chemicals that confer survival and reproductive advantages. We discuss the implications regarding the relative importance of direct and indirect selection in maintaining female preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Caitlin A. Kelly & Amanda J. Norbutus & Anthony F. Lagalante & Vikram K. Iyengar, 2012. "Male courtship pheromones as indicators of genetic quality in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 1009-1014.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:5:p:1009-1014.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars064
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:5:p:1009-1014.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.