Condition dependence and the origins of elevated fluctuating asymmetry in quality signals
Developmental stability is the ability of organisms to buffer development against perturbations. Different classes of traits typically have different levels of fluctuating asymmetry (FA), a measure of developmental instability. In particular, elevated FA in sexually selected quality signals has attracted a great deal of attention. There are 3 main hypotheses to explain elevated developmental instability in quality signals. Developmental instability may be related to the cost of trait production, a trait's condition dependence, or the levels of interindividual trait variation. Here we test these 3 hypotheses by comparing FA in structural traits, nonsignaling color traits, and 2 signaling color traits: a condition-dependent quality signal in Polistes dominulus wasps and noncondition-dependent identity signals in P. fuscatus wasps. Overall, color traits have higher FA than structural traits, though FA differs among the 3 classes of color traits. The clypeal identity signal in P. fuscatus has the highest interindividual trait variation, yet shows relatively low FA, indicating that interindividual trait variation does not explain heightened FA. The quality signal in P. dominulus has the highest FA, though it is not costly to produce. Therefore, the elevated FA in quality signals cannot be attributed to costs of signal production. The quality signal in P. dominulus is condition dependent, however, so our results indicate that increased developmental instability in quality signaling traits can be attributed to their condition-dependent development. A link between developmental stability and condition dependence provides a mechanism through which quality signals may integrate information about overall condition in the absence of costly trait development. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 22 (2011)
Issue (Month): 6 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK|
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:6:p:1166-1172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.