IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v22y2011i5p923-931.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lethal combat over limited resources: testing the importance of competitors and kin

Author

Listed:
  • Tabitha M. Innocent
  • Stuart A. West
  • Jennifer L. Sanderson
  • Nita Hyrkkanen
  • Sarah E. Reece

Abstract

Although most animals employ strategies to avoid costly escalation of conflict, the limitation of critical resources may lead to extreme contests and fatal fighting. Evolutionary theories predict that the occurrence and intensity of fights can be explained by resource value and the density and relatedness of competitors. However, the interaction between these factors and their relative importance often remains unclear; moreover, few systems allow all variables to be experimentally investigated, making tests of these theoretical predictions rare. Here, we use the parasitoid wasp Melittobia to test the importance of all these factors. In contrast to predictions, variation in contested resource value (female mates) and the relatedness of competitors do not influence levels of aggression. However, as predicted, fight intensity increased with competitor density and was not influenced by the greater cost of fighting at high density. Our results suggest that in the absence of kin recognition, indirectly altruistic behavior (spite) is unlikely to evolve, and in such circumstances, the scale of competition will strongly influence the amount of kin discrimination in the form of level of aggression as observed in Melittobia species. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Tabitha M. Innocent & Stuart A. West & Jennifer L. Sanderson & Nita Hyrkkanen & Sarah E. Reece, 2011. "Lethal combat over limited resources: testing the importance of competitors and kin," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(5), pages 923-931.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:5:p:923-931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq209
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:5:p:923-931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.