Dominance status and carcass availability affect the outcome of sperm competition in burying beetles
Intense intrasexual competition between males often results in the establishment of a dominance hierarchy, promoting differential access to females. Dominant males are expected to evolve more prudent sperm allocation strategies, whereas subordinate males are expected to counteract their mating disadvantage by increasing their sperm allocation. Burying beetles, insects that breed on small vertebrate carcasses, offer an ideal model for testing these predictions because aggressive interactions between males typically result in one dominant male that monopolizes access to the female, relegating subordinates to sneak matings. Males that have not found a carcass use pheromones to attract females and only obtain a small number of matings per day. We measured the mating frequency of males competing on a carcass and confirmed that dominant males mate significantly more often than subordinates. We then examined the paternity of competing males, with a 5:1 mating advantage for the dominant male, to determine whether relative mating frequency is sufficient to explain the severe reproductive skew in polyandrous broods in the field. When competing on a carcass, dominant males did not sire significantly more offspring than subordinates. However, when males mated without a carcass and did not interact, significantly more offspring were sired by the dominant male, but even here, the subordinate male's paternity was greater than his share of matings. Our results show that when males compete on a carcass, dominant males have a clear mating advantage, whereas subordinates appear to transfer greater numbers of sperm per mating to compensate for their limited mating opportunities. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 22 (2011)
Issue (Month): 5 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:5:p:1079-1087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.