Female--female aggression around mating: an extra cost of sociality in a multimale primate society
Multimale--multifemale groups, where both sexes mate promiscuously and the operational sex ratio is male biased, represent a classical mammalian society. Theory predicts low mating competition between females in such societies, but this is inconsistent with the frequent occurrence of female sexual signals. This study explores the determinants of female competition under such conditions by testing 3 hypotheses relating to patterns of aggression over the reproductive cycle in wild chacma baboons (Papio ursinus). Primarily, we expect the frequency of aggression to be highest among 1) lactating and pregnant females, who experience the greatest energetic demands, if females compete mainly over food, 2) lactating females, if females compete mainly over paternal care of infants, or 3) sexually active (swollen) females, if females compete mainly over mates. Data were collected from 27 females in 2 groups over 18 months and analyzed using mixed models. Our results provide most support for the mating competition hypothesis: aggression increases with the number of swollen females in a group, swollen females receive the most aggression, and mate-guarded swollen females receive more aggression than when unguarded. However, our analyses further indicate that such aggression rather than arising from direct mating competition, most likely reflects reproductive suppression and/or an increased exposure of swollen females to incidental aggression. These findings reveal the importance of sex in shaping social relationships among females in large primate groups where they were traditionally considered to be determined primarily by access to resources. Aggression associated with access to mates represents an extra cost of sociality to females. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 22 (2011)
Issue (Month): 5 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK|
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:5:p:1003-1011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.