IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v22y2011i4p862-868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony C. Little
  • Julieanne Connely
  • David R. Feinberg
  • Benedict C. Jones
  • S. Craig Roberts

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism is important in mate choice in many species and can be appraised via multiple traits in any one individual. Thus, one question that arises is whether sexual dimorphism in different traits influences preferences consistently. Here, we examined human preferences for masculinity/femininity in different types of stimuli. For face and body stimuli, images were manipulated to be more or less masculine using computer graphic techniques. Voice stimuli were made more or less masculine by manipulating pitch. For smell, we used variation among male aftershaves as a proxy for manipulating masculinity of real male smell and used relatively masculine/feminine odors. For women, we found that preferences for more masculine stimuli were greater for short-term than for long-term relationships across all stimuli types. Further analyses revealed consistency in preferences for masculinity across stimuli types, at least for short-term judgments, whereby women with preferences for masculinity in one domain also had preferences for masculinity in the other domains. For men, we found that preferences for more feminine stimuli were greater for short-term than for long-term judgments across face and voice stimuli, whereas the reverse was true for body stimuli. Further analyses revealed consistency in preferences for masculinity across stimuli types for long-term judgments, whereby men with preferences for femininity in one domain also had preferences for femininity in the other domains. These data suggest that masculinity/femininity as a trait may be assessed via different modalities and that masculinity/femininity in the different modalities might be representing a single underlying quality in individuals. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony C. Little & Julieanne Connely & David R. Feinberg & Benedict C. Jones & S. Craig Roberts, 2011. "Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(4), pages 862-868.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:862-868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr061
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benedict C. Jones & David R. Feinberg & Christopher D. Watkins & Corey L. Fincher & Anthony C. Little & Lisa M. DeBruine, 2013. "Pathogen disgust predicts women’s preferences for masculinity in men’s voices, faces, and bodies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 373-379.
    2. Barnaby J. Dixson & Jamie C. Tam & Monica Awasthy, 2013. "Do women’s preferences for men’s facial hair change with reproductive status?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 708-716.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:862-868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.