IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Attractiveness of grasshopper songs correlates with their robustness against noise

Listed author(s):
  • Anne Einhäupl
  • Nicole Stange
  • R. Matthias Hennig
  • Bernhard Ronacher
Registered author(s):

    Long-range communication signals commonly serve to attract mates. Evolution of such signals was channeled by 2 classes of constraints: signals have to be conspicuous against background noise and signals should enable the receiver--in particular females that invest heavily in offspring--to assess the sender's quality and attractiveness as a sexual partner. However, as noise in the transmission channel likely conceals quality cues present in signals, these goals may represent opposing selective forces. We explored how noise affects the preferences of choosy female grasshoppers toward the communication signals of individual males. Our prediction was that male signals would become less distinguishable with increasing noise levels and, hence, female preferences for attractive signals would disappear. Here, we show that, contrary to this prediction, the differences in attractiveness between natural male songs were preserved even at high noise levels: the most attractive signals were at the same time particularly robust against masking. We discuss these results in view of a sensory exploitation scenario and a potential reduction of females' costs of choosiness. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by International Society for Behavioral Ecology in its journal Behavioral Ecology.

    Volume (Year): 22 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 4 ()
    Pages: 791-799

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:791-799
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK

    Fax: 01865 267 985
    Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:791-799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)

    or (Christopher F. Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.