IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attractiveness of grasshopper songs correlates with their robustness against noise


  • Anne Einhäupl
  • Nicole Stange
  • R. Matthias Hennig
  • Bernhard Ronacher


Long-range communication signals commonly serve to attract mates. Evolution of such signals was channeled by 2 classes of constraints: signals have to be conspicuous against background noise and signals should enable the receiver--in particular females that invest heavily in offspring--to assess the sender's quality and attractiveness as a sexual partner. However, as noise in the transmission channel likely conceals quality cues present in signals, these goals may represent opposing selective forces. We explored how noise affects the preferences of choosy female grasshoppers toward the communication signals of individual males. Our prediction was that male signals would become less distinguishable with increasing noise levels and, hence, female preferences for attractive signals would disappear. Here, we show that, contrary to this prediction, the differences in attractiveness between natural male songs were preserved even at high noise levels: the most attractive signals were at the same time particularly robust against masking. We discuss these results in view of a sensory exploitation scenario and a potential reduction of females' costs of choosiness. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Einhäupl & Nicole Stange & R. Matthias Hennig & Bernhard Ronacher, 2011. "Attractiveness of grasshopper songs correlates with their robustness against noise," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(4), pages 791-799.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:791-799

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:791-799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.