Duty cycle, not signal structure, explains conspecific and heterospecific responses to the calls of Black-capped Chickadees (Poecile atricapillus)
Animals can encode information into signals using at least 2 basic mechanisms. First, signalers can repeat their signals, encoding information into sequence-level parameters, such as signaling rate. Second, signalers can encode information into the fine structural variation of individual signals. This mechanism requires sophisticated encoding and decoding but potentially affords more rapid or efficient information transfer. The chick-a-dee call of Parid birds is a structurally complex signal that conveys food- and predator-related information to both conspecific and heterospecific receivers. However, the basic mechanism by which it communicates information is unclear. Previous research suggests that variation in the number of terminal notes is important, but this structural trait has not been manipulated independently from other structural traits or from sequence-level parameters, such as total duty cycle. We independently manipulated the fine structure and duty cycle of the calls of Black-capped Chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) and then broadcast them to potential receivers. Both conspecific and heterospecific receivers ignored manipulations to the fine structure of individual calls when the duty cycle of the signaling sequences was held constant. In marked contrast, receivers exhibited significantly stronger responses when the duty cycle was experimentally increased, and the fine structure of individual calls was held constant. Specifically, signaling sequences with a high duty cycle attracted more conspecific and heterospecific receivers and caused those receivers to approach the speaker more quickly, to approach the speaker more closely, and to remain within 10 m of the speaker for longer. These findings show that receivers respond to a simple sequence-level trait in a structurally complex avian signal. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 22 (2011)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:784-790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.