Sex-specific effects of size and condition on timing of natal dispersal in kangaroo rats
The effects of proximal cues in eliciting natal dispersal are predicted to vary between sexes because of differences in reproductive strategies. I examined how body mass and condition affected timing of natal dispersal in male and female banner-tailed kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis), a species that lacks sex-biased dispersal. I experimentally manipulated cues by providing additional food to a subset of offspring prior to dispersal. All supplemented offspring, regardless of sex, grew faster, were in better condition, and had higher survivorship than unsupplemented offspring. Sons who received food supplements dispersed earlier than unsupplemented sons, indicating that timing of dispersal was related to size and condition. Timing of dispersal in daughters was unaffected by resource supplementation, suggesting that size and condition are less important proximal cues. These sex-specific responses match the intersexual differences in mammalian reproductive strategies and parental investment patterns. My results support the hypothesis that sons remain at the natal territory until a certain threshold of size and condition is reached. Male reproductive success is typically dependent on body size, which affects their ability to find and defend mates. By allowing sons to remain at the natal territory until this threshold is attained, mothers likely increase the fitness of their sons. Female reproductive success is influenced more by securing resources than by body size. Thus, dispersing as early as developmentally feasible would allow daughters to secure an existing burrow system and maximize the time available for caching food prior to their first breeding attempt. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 22 (2011)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK|
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:776-783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.