Diet selection in birds: trade-off between energetic content and digestibility of seeds
Partial preferences may occur due to differences in profitability and encounter probability between food types within a patch. In the expanding specialist diet strategy, a forager goes from being partially selective on the preferred, most profitable food, to being opportunistic, after the preferred food has been depleted to a certain critical level. We studied the diet selection strategies of birds foraging on 2 seed types--crushed peanut Arachis hypogaea and husked millet Pennisetum gambiense, in a woodland savannah near Jos, Nigeria. Peanut contains more fat and energy, whereas millet is richer in carbohydrates. We tested 2 hypotheses: 1) energy content will determine seed preference for seeds with relatively similar handling times and 2) diet selection will vary seasonally in response to nutritional demands. We carried out 2 experiments, one with both seed types occurring in a single patch and another with both occurring in 2 separate patches during different seasons. The diet selection strategy of the birds was similar to the expanding specialist. Initially, peanuts seemed to be the preferred food, probably due to their high profitability, but overall millet was preferred. However, the expansion point was not determined by the amount of peanut seeds left, as predicted, but rather by the amount eaten. We propose that a trade-off is created by the fact that peanut has higher energy density but at the same time contains secondary compounds. Selectivity for millet decreased slightly in the wet season when more peanuts were taken possibly due to increasing nutritional demands during breeding. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 22 (2011)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:639-647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.