IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diet selection in birds: trade-off between energetic content and digestibility of seeds


  • Mary Ngozi Molokwu
  • Jan-Åke Nilsson
  • Ola Olsson


Partial preferences may occur due to differences in profitability and encounter probability between food types within a patch. In the expanding specialist diet strategy, a forager goes from being partially selective on the preferred, most profitable food, to being opportunistic, after the preferred food has been depleted to a certain critical level. We studied the diet selection strategies of birds foraging on 2 seed types--crushed peanut Arachis hypogaea and husked millet Pennisetum gambiense, in a woodland savannah near Jos, Nigeria. Peanut contains more fat and energy, whereas millet is richer in carbohydrates. We tested 2 hypotheses: 1) energy content will determine seed preference for seeds with relatively similar handling times and 2) diet selection will vary seasonally in response to nutritional demands. We carried out 2 experiments, one with both seed types occurring in a single patch and another with both occurring in 2 separate patches during different seasons. The diet selection strategy of the birds was similar to the expanding specialist. Initially, peanuts seemed to be the preferred food, probably due to their high profitability, but overall millet was preferred. However, the expansion point was not determined by the amount of peanut seeds left, as predicted, but rather by the amount eaten. We propose that a trade-off is created by the fact that peanut has higher energy density but at the same time contains secondary compounds. Selectivity for millet decreased slightly in the wet season when more peanuts were taken possibly due to increasing nutritional demands during breeding. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Ngozi Molokwu & Jan-Åke Nilsson & Ola Olsson, 2011. "Diet selection in birds: trade-off between energetic content and digestibility of seeds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(3), pages 639-647.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:639-647

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:639-647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.