Responses to intruder scents in the cooperatively breeding meerkat: sex and social status differences and temporal variation
Although sex-specific responses to intruder scent marks have been described in many mammal species, less is known about variation in responses in cooperatively breeding species where differential access to breeding opportunities exists within groups. When reproductive skew is high, strong responses to extragroup breeding rivals would be expected mainly from dominant individuals, with levels of investment depending on female receptiveness. However, evidence from controlled experiments on cooperative breeders for sex and social status differences in responses to intruder scent marks is limited. Here, we investigated responses to intruder scent marks in cooperatively breeding meerkats (Suricata suricatta), where a single dominant pair largely monopolizes within-group reproduction. A series of experimental presentations using feces were used to test first, whether meerkats discriminate between resident and extragroup male scent marks; second, whether sex and social status affect the response to intruding male scents; and third, whether dominant males increase their level of response when dominant females are most receptive. Our results suggest that meerkats are able to discriminate between resident and intruding male scent marks and show that dominant males have the strongest overall response to intruder scent marks, which does not increase with female receptiveness. We suggest that, although all group members may be affected by the presence of intruders, reproductive conflict may be the main reason for the stronger response of dominant males to extragroup male scent marks in this cooperatively breeding species with high reproductive skew. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 22 (2011)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:594-600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.