IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v22y2011i3p552-558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No risk, no gain: effects of crop raiding and genetic diversity on body size in male elephants

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick I. Chiyo
  • Phyllis C. Lee
  • Cynthia J. Moss
  • Elizabeth A. Archie
  • Julie A. Hollister-Smith
  • Susan C. Alberts

Abstract

Body size is an important influence on the life history of males of polygynous mammals because it is usually highly correlated with fitness and is under intense selection. In this paper, we investigated the effect of high-risk foraging behavior (crop raiding) and genetic heterozygosity on male body size in a well-studied population of African elephants. Crop raiding, the foraging on cultivated food crops by wildlife is one of the main causes of wildlife human conflict and is a major conservation issue for many polygynous mammals that live in proximity to agriculture or human habitation. Body size was estimated using hind foot size, a measure strongly correlated with stature and mass. Crop raiding predicted male size in adulthood, with raiders being larger than nonraiders. However, elephants that became raiders were neither larger nor smaller for age when young. Enhanced growth rates and size among raiders suggest that taking risks pays off for males. Lastly, genetic heterozygosity had no effect on size for age in male elephants, most likely because low-heterozygosity males were rare. Risky foraging behavior can evolve as a result of strong sexual selection for large size and condition-dependent mating success in males. We discuss the implications of these results for managing human--wildlife conflict. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick I. Chiyo & Phyllis C. Lee & Cynthia J. Moss & Elizabeth A. Archie & Julie A. Hollister-Smith & Susan C. Alberts, 2011. "No risk, no gain: effects of crop raiding and genetic diversity on body size in male elephants," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(3), pages 552-558.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:552-558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:552-558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.