Multiple routes to reduced interspecific territorial fighting in Hetaerina damselflies
Interspecific territoriality may be adaptive if territories contain depletable resources that are valuable to both species, but it can also arise as a maladaptive by-product of intraspecific territoriality. In the latter scenario, sympatric species ought to diverge in ways that reduce interspecific fighting. We studied 4 Hetaerina damselfly species that can be found in sympatry in North America. Prior work showed that sympatric populations have diverged from each other in wing coloration and competitor recognition in 2 of the 4 sympatric species pairs (H. titia/H. occisa, H. titia/H. americana). Here, we show that sympatric populations of these 2 species pairs overlap completely in habitat use, and yet, interspecific territorial fights occur much less frequently than intraspecific fights. Experimentally manipulating the wing coloration of male H. occisa and H. americana to more closely resemble H. titia increased the rate of interspecific fights, which provides direct evidence that divergence in wing coloration is partly responsible for the low rate of interspecific fights. We found that interspecific fighting is also reduced in the other 2 species pairs (H. occisa/H. cruentata, H. americana/H. cruentata), even though prior work showed that heterospecific territory intruders are attacked just as aggressively as conspecific territory intruders. In these cases, however, the sympatric species differ sufficiently in habitat use to reduce the interspecific encounter rate and thereby account for the reduced rate of interspecific fighting. Thus, interspecific fighting is reduced relative to intraspecific fighting in all 4 species pairs, albeit through different mechanisms. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 22 (2011)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK|
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:527-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.