IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v22y2011i1p46-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Closer clutch inspection--quicker egg ejection: timing of host responses toward parasitic eggs

Author

Listed:
  • Milica Požgayová
  • Petr Procházka
  • Lenka Polačiková
  • Marcel Honza

Abstract

The prevalent, and so far most explored, host defense against brood parasitism is egg discrimination. Not only do the hosts differ markedly in their propensity to reject parasitic eggs but rejecters even vary in their egg rejection times. The focus of the present study was to investigate factors potentially responsible for high variation in timing of host egg rejection. As a model species, we chose the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus, a cuckoo Cuculus canorus host, with female-restricted egg ejection behavior. We presented a cuckoo dummy near host nests and experimentally parasitized the clutches with a nonmimetic egg. Immediately afterward, we continuously video recorded host behavior to determine egg ejection times accurately. We fitted a regression tree model with the timing of egg ejection as a dependent variable and female-related characteristics (body condition, eggshell coloration, and behavior) as explanatory variables. Only female behavior toward the foreign egg proved to have a significant effect on the timing of egg ejection. Females devoting more time to clutch inspection ejected the egg significantly more quickly than females inspecting their experimentally parasitized clutches only briefly. We discuss our results in the context of known intra- and interspecific differences in host response times toward alien eggs and cognitive mechanisms involved in host egg discrimination processes. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Milica Požgayová & Petr Procházka & Lenka Polačiková & Marcel Honza, 2011. "Closer clutch inspection--quicker egg ejection: timing of host responses toward parasitic eggs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(1), pages 46-51.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:1:p:46-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq163
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:1:p:46-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.